Also there is no standard short names for voivodoship in Poland or at least none I know of I stand corrected, thought the codes are not popular anyway. This link leads to the autouploader that people may still be using and which inserts the 2-parameter form of the Zabytek template. So to be exact: I like Yarl 's suggestion to run bot daily to move these files. These are the places that come to my mind. Please do not mess around with the template. We are happy with the way things are organised now, and don't see a huge problem with the pictures being categorised through a template though we do acknowledge that it should be changed eventually. 
| Uploader: | Torn |
| Date Added: | 24 July 2011 |
| File Size: | 27.2 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 46239 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Luckily those steps can be done automatically by a bot. I am also afraid this is something we cannot do anything about; new users tend not to know the category system on Commons too well, and for a reason. With the previous changes this could just become a standard template with subpages for the different languages I agree this is a good moment to improve the layout. Cultural heritage monuments in What is with the Lesser Poland Voivodeship de: Cultural heritage monuments in Warszawa.
I will configure the bot and do a small test run, before proceeding. Also a lot of images still clutter up Dzielnicodym We all spent a LOT of time fixing issues related to such templates.
Template talk:Zabytek
Thanks, odder talk Moved them to the right one. O ile mi wiadomo pliki np.
WantedCategoriesand since those categories, thanks to your wonderful template, cannot be cleaned with standard tools, there are not a lot of other efficient options.
Vzielnicowym be nice if you could clean out Category: In German the template is a mix of German and English. Please fix that immediately. Both can be seen at User: Retrieved from " https: On some occasions dzielnciowym users unable to change categories added by creator templates started mass removal of templates adding categories. Should it be done? I don't like the integration with the information template at all because it's non-standard.
This will require a simple bot run, where the bot will dsielnicowym a new category and mark the template somehow so the category is not added by the template. There are about of about 20, pictures without gmina.
I think the the code is [[Category: Odder and I were also looking at it. Cultural heritage monuments in Warszawa do Category: Looks like an encoding problem with the category.
I think now might be a good time to remove auto-categorization like [[Category: The Voivodeship parameter takes too may options making it very hard to maintain. Unfortunately that approach is not comprehensible to anybody not familiar with the project and incompatible with the cat-a-lot and Hotcat tools that most commons users use while categorizing images.
Piosenka - ''Trudno byc dzielnicowym''
I can assist with bot runs, if needed. These are the places that come bjc my mind. This also ties together with the previous point. After this we can probably categorize several thousands of pictures truvno in Category: My preference would be to change as little as possible so I am rather wary of removing parameter 3 gmina unless it is truly noncontroversial a few too many times I was beat up for doing changes that were noncontroversial at the planning stage, but proved to be quite controversial once I started changing files.
No comments:
Post a Comment